I was shocked today. I was going over my board certification essays with my supervisor today. He is kind, and really never has nor would try to make me be anyone but who I am. But in going through my essays, he was pointing out the places that the certification board might find fault with me. Now I am pretty ok with getting criticism, able to hold it, find something with it or throw it away. But here it felt like I was being told that who I am isn’t right, that the board will find issues with the thing I find as the core of my chaplaincy.
I was shocked in this. I was shocked that I started crying while talking to him. Because after three times of the same thing – showing the points that are “counter cultural” – like looking for joy, using small talk, being ok dancing – it might cause me “trouble” when I go speak before the board. And in having this conversation, it felt like I was being told that my way of being is “trouble”. This paper is very much about myself. How I am as a chaplain. What drives me. What allows me to be with people. And then to be told that I will have to find a defense because it “is not the usual”. I felt like I was given the choice of either building a defense or changing what I wrote so I would “fit in.” And all this brought up my fear of having my voice and my identity taken away; being told I need to do and think in a certain way to get places; that the only way to make it is if I lose myself.
I have tried so hard over the past two years to find myself again. To find that voice and strength I know I used to have. To be able to stand on my own feet and be proud of what I am doing, and feel confident again. And the reality is, in work I do feel that way. I am told I am doing a good job. I see the way that patients work with me. I see how staff regards me. But for some reason this conversation today really struck me. And maybe it’s because other things are going on — parts of my identity are going to be changing soon, and maybe I want at least this to be mine.
I am ok fighting for it. I feel confident that what I am doing is real. In all my examples of play and joy, they always lead to a place that we spoke about suffering. It is my way to get in deep.
In this conversation I was also thinking about writing. Where my supervisor said something, and my answer was “I’m not a good writer”, to which he looked at me very confused. He was confused that I thought that about myself, as what I hand in is concise and makes sense. And yet I still have this fear.
I have the fear of writing because I was told too often that I’m not good at it. I have the fear of “playing the game”, because the last time they tried to make me not me; make me use their words; make me be have their ideas.
While thinking about all this – and I don’t have full thoughts yet. I’m still a bit embarrassed and a bit confused – I thought of a book I read recently called “Playing Big” by Tara Mohr. It is a book that I was told to read for a book club I am joining. It is a group of women who will soon encourage one another to write and publish, and push ourselves outside of being afraid, and to get to the places we want to go. I really hope that will help. This book was really great. The ideas are beautiful and encouraging. It is a book that is leading people into a place of affirmation, rather than negation.
As I talked with friends about what was occurring at my organization, I heard similar stories, again and again, about theirs: stories about charismatic male leaders at the helm, men who made bold but often rash decisions. Their organizations too were full of talented, hardworking women in lieutenant and other senior roles. Those women worked longer hours, were more attuned to the details, and had more experience and knowledge. Yet they were not leading at the highest of levels, both because they were not being put in positions of leadership and because they weren’t sharing audacious ideas or initializing big plans. Their employers were utilizing their strong work ethic but not their brilliance — their unique ideas, insights, and talents.
pg. xxiii
Our usual cultural conversation divides the challenges into two categories: unfair external barriers to women’s advancement that women are victims of (discrimination, bias, poor work-family policies, pay disparities) and internal psychological things that women “do to themselves” and for which women are therefore to blame.
pg. xxvii
But in equality of men and women has also left internal effects in us. Over generations, it shaped how we think of ourselves and what we see as possible for our lives and work. It shaped our fears – fears of speaking up, of rocking the boat, of displeasing others. It caused women to develop a number of behaviors that enabled them to survive in environments where they had no legal, financial, or political power – behaviors like conflict avoidance, self-censoring, people-pleasing, tentative speech and action.
pg. xxvii-xxviii
Since women don’t talk to one another about the most vicious things it [voice of the inner critic] says, we don’t hear the counterarguments or get support, and we don’t learn that other women–women we admire because they seem so confident — hear the same irrational, harsh voice in their heads.
pg. 2
Many women find their inner critic speaks up most loudly around their most deeply felt dreams for their lives and work, because we feel particularly vulnerable about them. They experience the most panicky, overwhelming self-doubt when they are moving toward what they truly long to do.
pg. 10
Though dressed in the guise of women’s empowerment, all the encouragement for women to find the right mentors and right advice is often, underneath, the same old message telling them to turn away from their own intuitions and wisdom and to privilege guidance coming from others instead.
pg. 44
Younger women can’t find the mentors they seek, often because female leaders in their fields are so few or overtaxed. Or, when they look at those leaders, they don’t see careers or lives they want to emulate, and the advice they receive from them simply doesn’t resonate.
pg. 44-45
The traditional mentor-mentee hierarchical relationship is particularly tricky for women as they step into playing bigger, because that often involves their pioneering new ways of crafting their lives and careers or acting as a change agents in their organization or communities. As innovators, their primary need is not for someone who went before them who can show them the ropes and give advice based on what worked for them. Rather, they need tools and encouragement to find their own unprecedented ways forward.
pg. 45
‘It’s a failure of imagination. If people haven’t been taught how to use their creativity, how to imagine , then they can’t create a dramatically different reality than what they know today, because they can’t imagine it.’
pg. 47
We feel pachad when the ego perceives something it feels will wound the ego’s fragile self-concept in some way. We feel yirah when the ego perceives that something had the potential to bring us into transcendence of the ego….‘Yirah is the fear of dissolving a boundary, while pachad is the fear that I feel within that boundary.’
pg. 71
In rereading these quotes it is very clear to me what I need to do. It is clear that I need to write my truth, and share it. I need to share the things that are a bit out of the norm. My essays are not totally out of the box. According to my supervisor, they are actually really good. He is just warning me of being questioned. So I just need to believe in myself more, know that sharing myself will feel better than hiding my voice, and knowing that I should play big.
ps. I’ll let you all know where this all ends up. 🙂
pps. read the book it’s really great